Trademark Office Said No to F-word Trademark, The Court Says F-Yes

U.S. Patent & Trademark Office Said No to F-word Trademark But Federal Circuit Says F- Yes

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the law against immoral or scandalous marks is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment as an unconstitutional restriction on free speech. The court reversed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s holding that the trademark FUCT is unregistrable.

Erik Brunetti owns the clothing brand “fuct,” which he founded in 1990. In 2011 he filed a trademark application for FUCT for various kinds of apparel. The trademark examiner in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office refused to register the trademark finding it comprised immoral or scandalous matter. Historically trademark laws have prohibited trademarks that contain “immoral or scandalous” subject matter. Mr. Brunetti appealed the trademark examiner’s refusal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”). The Board affirmed the examining attorney’s refusal to register the trademark for FUCT. Mr. Brunetti then appealed the Board’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which decided the present case on December 15, 2017. The full opinion is available on the website of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

The court went through a detailed analysis on whether the bar on the registration of immoral or scandalous trademarks was constitutional. In this analysis the court pointed out inconsistencies in the treatment of trademarks containing the acronym MILF.  Trademarks which were refused included “GOT MILF (clothing), MILF MANIA (adult online services), MILF SEEKER (adult entertainment services), and FROM SOCCER MOM TO MILF (self-help books for women).” However, the following trademarks were registered: “DIARY OF A MILF (adult online services), BACKROOM MILF (adult online services), FAT MILF (sandwich), and MILF NEXT DOOR (adult online services).” I wish I could have been a fly on the wall when this research was requested. “Hey Tanner, I’m so happy you’re clerking for us. Can you do some research for me? I’m gonna need you to find all of the trademarks about MILFs. I don’t mean some. I want ALL of the MILF trademarks by COB.”

Someone has to be wondering whether the court used the real F-word in the opinion. The answer is yes. In the opinion we found 23 occurrences of the real F-word. This has to be some kind of record.

Here is the uncensored image of the sweatshirt with the FUCT trademark, below.

(Photo credit to FUCT Clothing Store.)

For Intellectual Property Attorneys Only

Information from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s website provides the following data about this trademark application:

Word Mark FUCT
Goods and Services IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: Athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps; Children’s and infant’s apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments. FIRST USE: 19911231. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19911231
Standard Characters Claimed
Serial Number 85310960
Filing Date May 3, 2011
Current Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1B
Attorney of Record John R. Sommer
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE

Trademark Office Said No to F-word Trademark, The Court Says F-Yes

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>